Tag Archives: Christianity

Abuse in Fundamental Baptist Churches

I missed this 20/20 episode when it was originally aired a couple of months ago.  ABC’s Elizabeth Vargas and 20/20 took a look at stories of abuse in Independent Fundamental Baptists (IFB) Churches.  I found it through a commentary at the blog Stuff Fundies Like.  Here’s the episode:

 

You can find the print version HERE.

And additional discussions about the subject can be found at Sharper Iron, Fundamentally Reformed, and Pensees.Pastor Charles Chuck Phelps testifies during the Abuse in Fundamental Baptist Churches

Just to be fair…You can read Chuck Phelps’ response to the expose’ at his personal website (which appears to be set up just for this purpose).

If you grew up in Fundy circles like I did, I’m sure you know of similar stories. If you’re still trapped in fundyland, the altar is open…”behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation.” (2 Cor 6:2b)

Freemasonry & Christianity: A Televised Debate between W. Bro. Robert A. Gilbert & Rev. John Otis

While doing some web surfing, I came across a series of videos of a televised debate concerning the compatibility of Freemasonry and Christianity which aired on the UK satellite channel Revelation TV.  The debate involved Worshipful Brother Robert A. Gilbert and Reverend John Otis.  The videos are embedded below, but first an introduction to the participants:

W. Bro. Gilbert is a writer, editor and speaker.  He is Past Master of Quatuor Coronati Lodge No. 2076.  In 1997, He served as the Prestonian Lecturer for the United Grand Lodge of England.  He also served as editor of the masonic research journal Ars Quatour Coronotorum.

Rev. John Otis is Pastor of Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church, a church plant in Graham, NC affiliated with the Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church (CRPC) denomination.  He is the author of several books, including Unveiling Freemasonry’s Idolatry, which are self-published under his own publishing label Triumphant Publications.

What originally captured my attention, beyond my personal interest as both a Christian and Freemason, is the proximity of Rev. Otis’ church plant to my home, especially as my wife and I seek a church home.  Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church is meeting about a mile from my house in the chapel of Alamance Christian School, where both my wife and I were students.  I found the church website, which led me to Rev. Otis’ Triumphant Publications website and, in turn, to the debate videos.  For now, I’ve decided not to visit Rev. Otis’ church for a couple of reasons: First, I’m a bit wary of pastors who self-publish under their own label – it seems a bit egotistical and possibly a sign that their work may have been unaccepted by mainstream publishing houses; Second, I saw and heard enough in the debate to give me the impression that Rev. Otis’ understanding and application of the Christian Faith may be similar to the abusive fundamentalism that I am trying to avoid in selecting a church home.

While I don’t agree with Rev. Otis’ conclusions about Freemasonry, healthy debate is good for promoting understanding.  W. Bro. Gilbert had the more difficult position to present as most know much about Christianity and very little about Freemasonry.  In my experience, the average person’s knowledge of Freemasonry is limited to what they have seen on television.  I like to explain it this way…what if your only understanding of Christ was how He is presented on the History Channel, would you really know Christ?  Now consider that statement in relation to Freemasonry.  Keep that in mind as you watch…

My commentary on the debate is brief.  I believe that W. Bro. Gilbert did an excellent job presenting accurate information about Freemasonry.  I am disappointed that Rev. Otis bases the majority of his critique of masonry on hand-selected quotes from authors that, while they are prolific writers on masonic topics, are not authoritative for Freemasonry.  One point raised by Rev. Otis concerning a quote he took from Albert Pike’s Morals and Dogma was particularly frustrating to watch.  Following a familiar established pattern of anti-masons, Rev. Otis took Pike’s quote completely out of context and threw it out like it was a definitive proof of his viewpoint. Unsurprisingly, W. Bro. Gilbert was unprepared to respond as he was unfamiliar with the quote, as are most masons.  Pike is one of the most voluminous masonic writers and Morals and Dogma is perhaps his greatest work.  However, Neither Pike nor Morals and Dogma speak for Freemasonry.  Even the introduction to Morals and Dogma contains this preface from the Supreme Council of the Thirty-Third Degree for the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States,

“In preparing this work, the Grand Commander has been about equally Author and Compiler; since he has extracted quite half its contents from the works of the best writers and most philosophic or eloquent thinkers.  Perhaps it would have been better and more acceptable if he had extracted more and written less…The teachings of these Readings are not sacramental, so far as the go beyond the realm of Morality into those of other domains of Thought and Truth.  The Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite uses the word “Dogma” in its true sense, of doctrine, or teaching; and is not dogmatic in the odious sense of that term.  Every one is entirely free to reject and dissent from whatsoever herein may seem to him to be untrue or unsound.”

Even Pike’s peers knew he could be a bit “out there” and difficult to comprehend.  When considering Freemasonry and Christianity, I suggest the same approach recommended by the Supreme Council to the readers of Morals and Dogma…

“Weigh what is taught, and give it fair hearing and unprejudiced judgment.”

As I conclude this post, 2010 comes to a close and 2011 arrives.

To all my Christian brethren and Masonic brethren,

May the Lord bless your endeavors and grant health and happiness to you and your families in the new year.

Fraternally Yours,

Rev. Bro. Marcus S. Orr, Chaplain

Thomas M. Holt Lodge A.F. & A. M. No. 492

2b1ask1 Freemasonry & Christianity: A Televised Debate between W. Bro. Robert A. Gilbert & Rev. John Otis

 

Why are Christians So…

Here’s what Google’s autocomplete is returning as some of the top searched phrases when “Why are Christians so” is typed in…

Why Why are Christians So...

Makes you think.

Freemasonry and Christianity Questions

I received a comment on a recent post regarding some aspects of freemasonry.  I didn’t intend to write a dissertation on the subject, but couldn’t answer the questions adequately in the confines of the comment section.  I elected instead to devote an entire post to answering the questions.  I won’t even pretend to claim I’ve written an exhaustive reply.  I also don’t claim to have the most well-reasoned or developed answers to the reader’s questions.  There are much more intelligent men than I that have written volumes on the subject. For the purposes of providing some of my perspective and understanding of freemasonry and christianity, I’ve written this post.

Here are Bill’s comments/questions which followed my post, A Practical Theology of Brewing:

Friend, I just posted above and then read some of your other posts. I was surprised to read that you were entering Freemasonry. You should seek the advice of some of the men whose blogs you read on this. I’ll not rehash what you have surely already studied on the subject, but if God is the focus of Freemasonry, why keep it secret? Also, why can Masons use a Quran or a Book of Mormon instead of a Bible? Do all paths lead to God or is Jesus the only way? I can’t help but think that your tagline should be reversed and that you are going back into darkness.

Bill

And my reply,

Bill, thanks for your thoughtful questions.  You are correct to assume that I’ve studied quite a bit on Freemasonry, including Christian and secular perspectives, both pro and con.  Freemasonry is unique, interesting and hard to define.  There is nothing else quite like it.  It has been described a “beautiful system of morality, veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols.”  It is religious without being a religion.  I believe that most people find contention with freemasonry as a system philosophy and ethics rather than the fraternal aspects.
To answer some of your other questions…

If God is the focus of masonry, why keep it secret?
I don’t believe God to be the focus of Freemasonry.  However, expressed belief in God is required.  In my experience, I have found the focus of Freemasonry to be friendship, fellowship, benevolence and ethical development.  There are secrets in masonry.  Well, not really.  Even the most basic search on the internet or in the library will find the “secrets.”  Masons do oblige themselves not to reveal the “secrets” and for good reason, I believe.   I’m presently reading a book called “Born in Blood:  The Lost Secrets of Freemasonry” by historian John J. Robinson.  It’s a good book.  The origins of freemasonry have truly been lost.  No one truly knows whether modern speculative masonry developed from medieval operative stonemason guilds or from some other source.  However, Robinson makes a good argument for a connection between freemasonry with the disbanded and outlawed templar knights.  If Robinson is correct in his theory, many of the “secrets” and other aspect of masonry are easily understood.  He believed that the templar knights, on the run from both the church and the state found the mobility and secrecy of the stonemason guilds to be ideal for forming a “hidden network” within which they could survive.  This also leads into your other question…

Why can masons use a Quran or a Book of Mormon instead of a Bible?
If the templar connection were to be true, we are referencing a period of time in which a belief in God is necessary to undertake any kind of obligation.  Given that masonry seems to have developed in late medieval to early modern England and Scotland, it seems that a belief in the Christian God would have been a necessity.  However, there could have been problems even with choosing your christian perspective of God in a time when the country transitioned repeatedly between catholic, anglican and protestant monarchs.  An expressed belief in God seems sufficient for men who were under persecution from the church, had already lost peers to the inquisition and were facing the same tortures themselves if captured.  This tradition has survived in modern freemasonry and candidates must only declare their belief in God as atheists are not admitted (except in France, but that’s a much more extensive subject).  I’ve never been in a lodge that has used a Qur’an, Book of Moron, Talmud, Hindu Veda, Baghavad Gita, or the Five Classics.  I imagine without a doubt that such lodges exist in more diversely populated areas of the country than where I live.  I don’t have a problem with this.  Just as I don’t have a problem with the military, hospital or disaster relief chaplain who publicly prays in “the name of God” without specificity.  Whether in the lodge or in the public forum, the message conveyed is usually an acknowledgement of God’s sovereignty over man’s affairs.  It is the same way in a masonic lodge; God and His sovereignty and provision are publicly acknowledged before engaging in the business of the lodge.  This is much different than the forum of a church service for which the attendees are there for the stated purpose of worship.

Do all paths lead to God or is Jesus the only way?
All paths do not lead to God.  Jesus is the only way.  Masonry teaches neither because it doesn’t teach how to reach God, but rather how to live among men.  In accomplishing this, masonry uses allegory derived from biblical texts and concepts.  This shouldn’t be surprising considering that masonry developed in a predominantly Christian society.  From my perspective, it would seem that the muslim or hindu would find more objection in the allegory of masonry than would a Christian.  The symbolism of masonry is also an important teaching tool, but relates more to one’s relationship with mankind than with God.  For example, the mason’s tools, created for working in stone, are re-purposed for teaching ethical living which God requires (regardless of the faith to which one subscribes) of all mankind.  Some of these symbols have become common usage in our culture…on the level…on the square and convey the same message.  When we ask someone to “level with us” we are asking for them to be honest with us.  When we say that we got a “square deal” we understand that it means a fair transaction.  By no means to I believe that masonry is in any way superior to Christianity or biblical teaching.  But it can offer different perspectives within which to understand my own beliefs.  As a Christian, I can contemplate the mason’s square and examine whether my dealings with others are fair and consistent with my faith.

Ex Tenebris Lux

You mentioned my current tagline – Ex Tenebris Lux – or – Out of Darkness, Light.  Light is an interesting discussion, particularly to the Christian.  It is a recurring theme in Scripture from beginning to end.  The first recorded words of God are “Let there be light.”  King David says, “For thou art my lamp, O LORD: and the LORD will lighten my darkness.” (2 Sam 22:29) and “The LORD is my light and my salvation” (Ps 27:1).  The psalmist says, “Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path” (Ps 119:105).  Christ describes his followers as light when he says, “Ye are the light of the world” (Mat 5:14).  John speaks of Christ, saying, “In him was life; and the life was the light of men” (John 1:4).  Jesus says, “I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life” (John 8:12).  One of the most famous passages in Scripture using the symbolism of light is also from John,

“This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and  in him is no darkness at all. If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth: But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us” (1 Jn 1:5-8)

Like many words, light can take on different meanings depending on the context in which it is used.  It can be understood to be literal light, knowledge, guidance, revelation, understanding, holiness, and I’m sure many more usages than I’ve listed here.  Light also plays a part in masonic allegory as one “seeks light.”  My understanding of this search is that it is a search for knowledge of oneself through circumspection and self examination.  I have heard some criticism of this aspect of masonry accompanied by the declaration of Jesus, “I am the light.”  I’m always skeptical when someone pulls out a singular statement from Scripture to make a point without placing it in the context of Scripture.  If I were engaged in a difficult task at work and asked my superior to “light the way”, it would not be a challenge to Christ’s claim as “the light.”  It would merely be another symbolic usage of the language.  That is one of the reasons I like the phrase, “Ex Tenebris Lux.”  It can take on many meanings.  It can allude to the light of Christ in whom my salvation is secured.  It can represent the light of Scripture which is the rule and guide of my faith.  It can even represent gaining or sharing knowledge which is new to me, such as personal experiences (like learning to brew) or interesting facts or news.

I hope that this is helpful in answering some of your questions from my perspective.

2b1ask1 Freemasonry and Christianity Questions

Technorati Tags: , , ,